■連載一覧
  • どこへ行く混迷・韓国 国政介入事件の深層
  • トランプ大統領の衝撃 米国と世界はどこに向かう
  • 国防最前線・南西諸島はいま 第2部 自衛隊配備へ動く石垣島
  • 国防最前線・南西諸島はいま 第1部 与那国島・陸自駐屯地
  • トランプvsヒラリー 米大統領選まで1カ月
  • 2016/12/05
  • 2016/11/11
  • 2016/10/31
  • 2016/10/12
  • 2016/10/08
  • 2016 世界はどう動く-識者に聞く
  • 戦後70年 識者は語る
  • 2015 世界はどう動く-識者に聞く
  • 2014 世界はどう動く
  • 2016/1/04
  • 2015/8/09
  • 2015/1/07
  • 2014/1/06
  • 台湾に吹いた蔡英文旋風
  • ルポ・政権交代の攻防 台湾総統選
  • 二極化する香港 識者インタビュー
  • 香港誌「前哨」編集長 劉達文氏に聞く
  • 「雨傘革命」下の香港 揺れる一国二制度の行方
  • 揺れる香港 各派リーダーに聞く
  • 香港の普選運動 親中派民間団体代表の見方
  • 2016/1/18
  • 2015/12/26
  • 2015/7/12
  • 2014/11/21
  • 2014/11/14
  • 2014/11/06
  • 2014/7/08
  • ドゥテルテ大統領就任から3カ月 どこへ向かう比政権
  • 香港「自治」の行方 識者に聞く
  • 中華圏に浸透する同性婚
  • 中台関係の行方
  • 日米同盟と台湾 海洋安全保障の展望
  • 蔡英文時代の台湾 本土派路線のビジョンと課題
  • ASEANの夜明け アジアハイウエー7000キロルポ
  • 緊張 南シナ海
  • 中央アジア胎動 中国「新シルクロード」と日本の戦略
  • “政熱経熱”の中韓
  • 新QDRと米中軍事バランス
  • 新グレートゲーム・幻想だった中国の平和的台頭
  • 新グレートゲーム・中国南進の海
  • 2016/9/21
  • 2016/8/17
  • 2016/7/26
  • 2016/6/03
  • 2016/5/31
  • 2016/5/19
  • 2016/3/22
  • 2015/11/18
  • 2015/10/14
  • 2015/9/07
  • 2014/3/31
  • 2014/2/14
  • 2013/4/18
  • 多難な年明けのトルコ
  • EUと難民 UNHCRウィーン事務所報道官に聞く
  • ロシアのシリア内戦介入 アルアハラム財団事務局長に聞く
  • 2016/1/30
  • 2015/12/11
  • 2015/11/13
  • 蓮舫民進 疑問の船出
  • 新閣僚に聞く
  • 「立憲主義」について
  • 再改造内閣 始動
  • 安倍政権 新たな挑戦
  • 16参院選 注目区を行く
  • 伊勢志摩サミット
  • 憲法改正 ここが焦点
  • 筆坂元日本共産党ナンバー3と田村自民党政務調査会審議役が対談
  • 第3次安倍改造内閣スタート
  • 詳解 集団的自衛権 安保法制案の合憲性
  • 衆院選 自公圧勝 ~課題と展望~
  • ’14衆院選 注目区を行く
  • 第2次安倍改造内閣スタート
  • 日米首脳会談 成果と課題
  • 2016/9/17
  • 2016/9/02
  • 2016/8/22
  • 2016/8/04
  • 2016/7/12
  • 2016/6/30
  • 2016/5/23
  • 2016/4/25
  • 2016/4/04
  • 2015/10/08
  • 2015/8/06
  • 2014/12/16
  • 2014/12/07
  • 2014/9/05
  • 2014/4/26
  • 激震・翁長県政 「オール沖縄」の凋落
  • 普天間基地移設 経緯の検証と提言
  • 「援護法」に隠された沖縄戦の真実
  • 2016/1/26
  • 2015/10/01
  • 2013/7/08
  • どう見る金正恩体制 日韓専門家対談
  • 迎撃ミサイル配備 韓国の決断
  • 3代世襲“完成” 北朝鮮第7回党大会
  • 検証 元料理人 藤本氏の再訪朝
  • 韓国総選挙ショック
  • 日韓国交正常化50年 識者に聞く
  • どうする拉致解決 日朝ストックホルム合意1年
  • 日韓国交正常化50年 「嫌韓」「反日」を越えて
  • 張成沢氏失脚 北で何が起きたか
  • 2016/8/24
  • 2016/7/20
  • 2016/5/10
  • 2016/4/29
  • 2016/4/15
  • 2015/6/22
  • 2015/5/11
  • 2015/2/05
  • 2013/12/10
  • 待ったなし地球温暖化対策
  • 環境先進国フランスの挑戦
  • 迫る気候変動の脅威 どうする大災害への備え
  • 2016/1/02
  • 2015/10/07
  • 2015/9/21
  • オバマのLGBT外交 米国と途上国の「文化戦争」
  • トランプVSヒラリー 米大統領選まで3カ月
  • オバマ外交と次期米大統領の課題
  • 2016年米大統領選まで1年
  • 再考 オバマの世界観
  • オバマの対宗教戦争・第1部
  • オバマの対宗教戦争・第2部
  • 2016/9/26
  • 2016/8/06
  • 2016/6/14
  • 2015/11/08
  • 2015/7/06
  • 2013/8/05
  • 2013/9/30
  • JAXA宇宙探査計画
  • 2015/12/24
  • The Media Situation in Okinawa

    Robert D. Eldridge, Ph.D.

    Robert D. Eldridge, Ph.D.

       Over the course of several essays, I wish to discuss the unnatural state of the Okinawa media and political situation in Japan’s 47th prefecture, as well as touch on the recent “Hyakuta Incident,” which not only highlighted but also symbolized the problem with the media there.    Before this, I want to ask the question, what makes the Okinawa media so extreme and so disliked by some around Japan to the extent that many, including which the well-known novelist and commentator Hyakuta Naoki to state, whether in jest or in truth, the need to destroy the two local newspapers?    The short answer is the failure over the years of the two newspapers to honor the codes of the Japan Newspaper Publishers and Editors Association and I would add, loyalty to its readership who are paying subscriptions to purchase news that is impartial, fair, and neutral.    Recently, the editors of the Ryukyu Shimpo and Okinawa Times held joint press conferences in Tokyo, and at the Japan Press Club on July 2, 2015, Mr. Shiohira Yoshikazu argued that they enjoy the support of the readers and if they didn’t, they would have already been “run out of town.”    This statement is misleading in a couple of ways. First, he failed to mention that readership is actually down despite the consistently rising population of Okinawa (to the extent that there are strong rumors preceding the Hyakuta Incident that the Shimpo is in debt, which suggests the company might be using this incident to reinvigorate itself). For example, currently the Shimpo reportedly has approximately 202,000 readers versus the 207,000 of the Okinawa Times, but was previously higher. Of course, we can find that same trend nationally and internationally as well, where readers of print media are declining due to other sources of information, but I know many examples here in Okinawa where the decision to no longer read the local newspapers was made out of a conscientious statement of distrust in the reporting, essentially boycotting their purchase.    The second misleading statement by Mr. Shiohira is the fact that the two local newspapers, a situation he did not raise. Together the two newspapers currently hold 99% of the local market share. For a variety of reasons, the five national newspapers, as well as the Yaeyama Nippō, a center-right newspaper from Ishigaki City, together make up only the remaining one percent. This creates a highly worrisome situation, in which information is controlled by the two local newspapers.    In most places where two local newspapers exist, there is a tendency for one to be center-right and the other center left in its editorial policy. One example is Washington, D.C., where the Washington Post is considered to the left, and the Washington Times, is considered on the right. Readers of one political persuasion or another, or those who like a certain writing style or layout, etc., will tend to choose one of the newspapers. It is therefore highly unusual for two newspapers in a small market to be of identical stance and composition. Explaining this abnormal—and I would argue, too, unhealthy—situation is the purpose of this commentary.    The reasons for their near-complete control over the market include the distance separating Okinawa from mainland Japan preventing the timely delivery mainland newspapers, their higher cost, and the lack of “hometown” news about Okinawa in the mainland newspapers, all of which cause potential readers in Okinawa (whose annual income is lower, only 74% of national average) not to buy mainland newspapers. Other reasons, especially strong in Okinawa with its senior population, is the previous lack of familiarity with the Internet (only 59% of the homes have broadband access, compared to 75% nationwide) due to its not having been readily available) and continued reliance on the print media. In addition, Okinawa is ranked last in the country for satellite television subscriptions.    The importance of the printed newspaper is seen in the daily observation of the obituary page for information about the passing of friends, relatives, teachers, and others to whom the reader is indebted. In a small island like Okinawa, social obligations, such as attending viewings and funerals, are very taken very seriously. The newspapers still tend to be the place to go for reading this information, as well as placing it if the death was in your family. The local newspapers, as such, charge a high price for the placement of these ads, which is a significant source of revenue for them.    Disturbingly, the editorial stances of these two newspapers, namely anti-base, anti-military, anti-mainland, anti-central government, etc., are also identical, as discussed above, which means there is a lack of choice and information for the readers and hence, the citizens of Okinawa as a whole.    Moreover, in addition to serving as the basis for the commentaries or editorials, these stances are sadly also strongly reflected in the actual reporting in the newspaper if not serving as the driver of the story itself, thus being against to the ethical guidelines adopted on June 21, 2000 by the Japan Newspaper Publishers and Editors Association known as the Canon of Journalism, which stressed among many other standards that “Reporting must be accurate and fair, and should never be swayed by the reporter’s personal conviction or bias.” .    In other localities, this might not be as serious a problem because there is access to additional information, such as the Internet and Social Media, but within Okinawa, due to its relatively low Internet use, it has been a hindrance to the population expanding its horizons and thus retaining its ignorances, prejudices, and biases. Moreover, Okinawans tend to travel and/or relocate less than their mainland compatriots, and will often spend much of their life in or near their hometown (this includes not only in reference to trips to the Japanese mainland, but within Okinawa itself). Furthermore, there is a greater myriad and complexity of social relations in Okinawa, which, combined with proximity, causes a tendency toward group think.    The group think and above issues of ignorance, prejudice, and/or bias, has led to a series of narratives about Okinawan history developed by academics, activists, and like-minded politicians, to suggest that Okinawa has been (and continues to be) discriminated against and/or victimized, etc.    It is particularly the Okinawa media that promotes this narrative and agenda, and constantly looks for examples, stories, or angles to events to prove their viewpoint, thus creating a never-ending cycle and self-fulfilling prophecy. Challenging this narrative or standing up to the media become more and more difficult for those politicians, government officials, business leaders, scholars, or reporters who believe or know differently.    In contrast, the Okinawa media will argue that it is “representing” public opinion, but it actually tries to “lead” the people through commission and omission. The Okinawa media will publish information, which may not always be correct, that is negative and/or potentially embarrassing about the central government or U.S. military, while simultaneously withholding stories that might be seen as positive and lying about their actions to cover up the story. In turn, the national media and the international media pick up on these stories and republish these allegations, often without checking the facts.    These actions, which are repeated numerous times daily, are part of the local media’s anti-base agenda, as with the pressure exerted on politicians and others to “toe” the line. The result is a dangerous mindset in Okinawa that one conservative commentator has called “totalitarianism.”    Democracy can only exist with the freedom of expression and an informed public. When the media is biased and has an agenda, rather than being objective and a healthy, it not only fails to serve as an important and healthy fourth pillar (or “estate”) in society, but it becomes a destructive force. The Okinawan media is out of control, which is not only bad for Japan and the U.S.-Japan relationship, as well as for the U.S. military presence and security for the entire region, but also for democracy itself.


    ...【全文を読む】
    記事の全文をご覧になるには会員登録が必要です。
    無料で毎月10本までご覧になれます。
    新規会員登録へ
    ログインへ

    コメント

    コメントの書き込み・表示するにはログインが必要です(承認制)。